A national survey to assess the state of anatomy teaching in France across various disciplines and professions.

PURPOSE: To investigate the current practices in anatomy teaching at French universities in 2023. METHODS: On January 10, 2023, a questionnaire was sent to all members of the official list of the French Medical College of Professors of Anatomy. Each Anatomy centre was asked to complete this online form only once. The questionnaire covered several key themes, including broad questions, dissections practices, "virtual" dissections, teaching methods and teaching staff. RESULTS: The questionnaire was completed by 26/28 anatomy centres. Access to body donor dissection is reported to be mandatory in 15 of the 26 centers (58%), optional in 10 centers (38%), and "tolerated" in one center (4%). Fifteen of 26 centers (58%) reported having a virtual dissection table for teaching anatomy. Concerning the teaching of anatomy via live ultrasound, 10 out of 26 centers (38%) reported providing it. Regarding the teaching methods used for medical students, chalk and board lectures are the most common method, although the intensity of use varies. Most lectures are given with chalk and board in 42% (11/26) of the centers. In about 73% (19/26) of the centers, tablet lectures are used. Regarding anatomy teachers, it was reported that in 24/26 anatomy centres (92%), more than 50% of the courses for medical students are taught by professors holding the chair of anatomy (21/26 professors (81%), 3/26 associate professors (12%)). CONCLUSION: The present study endeavors to contribute to the existing body of knowledge on anatomy education by offering insights into the current practices in French universities.

Assessment of using ultrasonography to teach abdominal and cervical anatomy in French medical curricula.

PURPOSE: The objective of this work was to assess, in a quantitative and qualitative way, the teaching of cervical and abdominal anatomy via ultrasound for medical students. METHODS: For several years, tutorials on the study of anatomy through use of ultrasound on the living organism have been given at the Medical School of Brest. These sessions have focused on cervical anatomy and abdominal anatomy. Students were invited to quantitatively assess these lessons by taking two tests containing questions on both cervical and abdominal anatomy and ultrasound technique: a pre-test administered at the beginning of the year and a post-test at the end of the year. In addition, a qualitative assessment was carried out at the end of the year. Ten statements were presented, and students were asked to indicate their agreement or disagreement to a four-point Likert scale. RESULTS: One hundred and twelve students answered all the questions on the pre-test with an average of 13.4 correct answers out of 20. Forty-eight students answered all the questions on the post-test with an average of 14.6/20. Twenty-six students who benefited from the courses gave positive feedback about the workshops on the qualitative assessment at the end of the year (median scores > = 3/4). CONCLUSION: The results of this work suggest that the use of ultrasound makes a positive contribution to the teaching of anatomy. The students interviewed think this type of tutorial should be an integral part of the anatomy curriculum at our university. In addition, this type of instruction can serve to introduce the use of ultrasound itself in a practical learning setting.